Dupixent CTCL Litigation: October 2026 Update

The federal Dupixent litigation involving cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) claims is proceeding as MDL No. 3180 in the District of New Jersey. According to the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation’s October 1, 2026 report, the MDL included 38 pending actions.

The cases are coordinated for pretrial proceedings. MDL centralization does not determine whether Dupixent caused CTCL or whether any defendant is liable. Read the Latest Litigation Update →

Dupixent & CTCL Lawsuits

Diagnosed with CTCL After Using Dupixent?

Patients across the country have filed lawsuits alleging that Dupixent contributed to their CTCL diagnoses and that its manufacturers failed to provide adequate warnings. MedLaw Group helps individuals and families explore potential legal claims and work with experienced litigation counsel.

Experienced Legal Guidance

Led by California attorney Keke Feng, with experience in complex litigation and access to experienced national litigation counsel.

Pharmaceutical Industry Perspective

Our legal approach draws on experience in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, including drug safety, regulatory issues, and complex medical evidence.

A Clear Path to Legal Help

If you or a family member received a CTCL diagnosis after using Dupixent, you can request a free initial case review to explore your potential legal options.

Why Patients Are Pursuing Dupixent CTCL Claims

Patients who developed CTCL after receiving Dupixent are pursuing legal claims against Sanofi and Regeneron, alleging that the manufacturers failed to provide adequate warnings about potential risks.

One important issue is that early CTCL can resemble eczema and other inflammatory skin conditions. For some patients, the diagnosis only became clear after persistent symptoms, additional testing, or changes during treatment. Their medical histories may raise important questions about when the disease developed, how it progressed, and whether it could have been recognized earlier.

These concerns are not limited to patients who took Dupixent for eczema. Individuals who received Dupixent for asthma, nasal polyps, or other approved conditions and were later diagnosed with CTCL or a related T-cell lymphoma can also request a free initial case review.

Legal Experience Behind MedLaw Group

MedLaw Group brings pharmaceutical and biotechnology legal experience and a background in complex federal litigation to potential Dupixent CTCL claims. We help individuals and families understand their legal options, with access to experienced national litigation counsel when appropriate.

Keke Feng, Esq.

Keke Feng, Esq.

California attorney with federal complex litigation experience

Former in-house pharmaceutical and biotechnology counsel

Understand Your Legal Options

Dupixent & CTCL Medical Background

Understand CTCL, related diagnoses, and the medical questions underlying potential legal claims.

Read Dupixent & CTCL

Dupixent Lawsuits & MDL Developments

Follow Dupixent lawsuit allegations, JPML filings, and developments in MDL No. 3180.

Read Litigation Updates

Could Your Case Qualify?

Learn how diagnosis, Dupixent treatment history, timing, and medical records inform a potential legal claim.

Understand Key Case Factors

Information That Helps Assess Your Potential Claim

Helpful starting information includes approximate Dupixent treatment dates, the CTCL-related diagnosis name, dermatology or oncology records, pathology reports, symptom timeline notes, and whether biopsy, specialist review, or second opinion was involved.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is this site for?

This site is for people who used Dupixent and were later diagnosed with CTCL, mycosis fungoides, Sézary syndrome, or another related T-cell lymphoma, and who want to explore their potential legal claims.

What diagnoses are the focus of this site?

This site is focused on CTCL and related T-cell lymphoma diagnoses, including mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Other cancers or unrelated lymphoma diagnoses may involve different medical and legal questions.

What do Dupixent CTCL lawsuits allege?

Plaintiffs allege that Dupixent contributed to CTCL diagnoses and that its manufacturers failed to provide adequate warnings. Court filings, medical literature, adverse-event data, and regulatory materials inform the litigation. Causation and liability remain disputed; each potential claim depends on individual facts.

What information helps attorneys assess a potential claim?

Helpful information includes Dupixent treatment dates, the diagnosis received, dermatology or oncology records, pathology reports, and a short timeline of symptoms, treatment, and diagnosis. You can request a free initial case review without having every record ready.

Does submitting a form create an attorney-client relationship?

No. Submitting information requests an initial review only and does not create an attorney-client relationship or mean a matter has been accepted.

About This Information

This page draws on court filings, medical literature, adverse-event data, and regulatory materials. Reported associations and safety signals do not establish causation. No court has made a final determination on the allegations discussed here.

Last reviewed by Keke Feng, Esq. — October 12, 2026

Start Free Case Review

If you used Dupixent and were later diagnosed with CTCL or another related T-cell lymphoma, request a free initial case review to explore your potential legal options. Legal deadlines may vary by state, and diagnosis timing can matter.

Call 888-271-9175 Start Free Case Review